This Memorial Day, we remember those who died in active military service, and pause to reflect on the sacrifices and suffering that occur during wartime. Some of the most horrific examples of both occurred in the trenches of World War I. Author David Lubin discussed the war's impact on soldiers, culture, and science with WFDD's David Ford back in 2014.

Lubin is the Charlotte C. Weber Professor of Art at Wake Forest University, and his book is Grand Illusions: American Art and the First World War.

What follows is an excerpt of that conversation on the intensity of trench warfare, and some of the resulting advances in medicine.

A quick warning that this conversation includes descriptions of injuries that may be disturbing.

On the history of trench warfare:

WWI was the first and really the only significant use of trench warfare in history—I mean trenches have been used for hundreds, thousands of years. But, during WWI there were trenches that extended from the English Channel to the Swiss Alps or about 500 miles of trenches where the enemies on the western front were facing one another—and I use that word

Placeholder
Before and after: patient with a facial prosthesis, American Red Cross for Portrait-Masks, Paris, 1918. (Photo Credit: Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution) 

“facing” advisedly because no part of the man's body was more vulnerable than the face. If a person was hidden in a trench, most of the body was protected, but if you looked up over the trench or certainly went over the trench in an attack, the first thing that was going to be exposed, and the part of the body that couldn't be armored was the face. So, therefore, thanks to flying shrapnel, and explosions, and sniper attacks, men were having their jaws sheared off, their noses blasted away, cheeks hollowed out, and this was the first time in history where men could have such severe damage done to their faces and not die of their wounds.

Placeholder
William M. Spreckley in stages of plastic surgery, 1917.  (Photo Credit: Archive of the Royal College of Surgeons of England)

On how soldiers were rehabilitated:

What happened was, these men would be rescued by nurses, taken behind the lines to hospitals and patched up well enough that eventually they could return to the [front] lines. But their fellow soldiers found them so repulsive—they smelled awful, they looked terrible—it was so bad for morale that the military officials said, 'We can't just let these people go back, patch them up and throw them back in the front lines,' even though that was what the First World War was ultimately all about, was having fodder for the other side to shoot. But they said, 'We need to do something to preserve these faces so the men are presentable back into the trenches.' And that's when modern plastic surgery came about, and various heroic plastic surgeons were making huge strides in plastic surgery.

Placeholder

Mutilated French soldier with mask by Anna Coleman Ladd, ca. 1918. (Photo Credit: Prints and Photographs Division, Library of Congress)

On the psychological impact on WWI soldiers with facial trauma:

One of the most striking things I read was by this great surgeon, a New Zealand surgeon named Sir Harold Gillies who became the great innovator of plastic surgery for the wounded men. He tells a story in his autobiography about a man in the ward, a beautiful boy, who had lost his face. And mirrors were forbidden in the ward. But at one point, this guy got ahold of a little shaving glass and he saw himself in the mirror. And he was just so depressed by it that he wouldn't come out, and he wouldn't talk to anybody and he spent the rest of his life as a recluse just because of the mental damage, psychological damage that his own self-image caused him.

 

 

 

On soldiers' treatment by society when they returned home from WWI:

Somewhere I read story about the BBC in England in the 1920s and 30s. There was a group of men that had all lost their faces during the war and they were so repulsive to the common, everyday eye that they just stayed reclusively inside the BBC studios. So, these men had beautiful voices and all over the country people were listening to them [on the radio], and hearing their golden tones, and imagining them to be these very handsome people. But that they would have to have a lad—a carry out boy—go out to the corner restaurants to find something for them to eat because they didn't want to go out in the streets themselves and be seen.    

 

 

300x250 Ad

300x250 Ad

Support quality journalism, like the story above, with your gift right now.

Donate