<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>photo ID law</title>
    <link>https://www.wfdd.org/tags/photo-id-law</link>
    <description>photo ID law</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:44:28 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.wfdd.org/tags/photo-id-law.rss" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" />
    <item>
      <title>NC Photo ID Law Suffers Second Setback</title>
      <link>https://www.wfdd.org/2020-02-18/nc-photo-id-law-suffers-second-setback</link>
      <description>A state appellate court issued a ruling today that blocked North Carolina's photo ID law indefinitely, pending a full trial.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img src="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/8794dc9/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x602+0+0/resize/702x528!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2FVOTE%20%281%29_1_0.jpg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><p><!--class="Mso"-->A state appellate court issued a<a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&amp;pdf=38774" target="_blank">&nbsp;ruling&nbsp;</a>today that blocked North Carolina's photo ID law indefinitely, pending a full trial.</p>
<p>The three judges unanimously ruled that the photo ID laws “are likely to disproportionately impact African American voters to their detriment.”</p>
<p>In November 2018, 55% of North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment requiring people to show a photo ID when they vote. The General Assembly then quickly approved implementing language for the amendment at the end of that year.</p>
<p>Last year, a&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wfae.org/post/court-says-it-will-block-photo-id-requirement-nc-voting#stream/2" target="_blank">federal court blocked</a>&nbsp;the use of photo ID for the March 3 primary.</p>
<p>North Republican Party Chairman Michael Whatley criticized the ruling, saying the three-judge panel's decision invalidates “the votes of more than 2 million North Carolinians” who voted for the amendment. He said it ignores similar laws in more than 30 other states.</p>
<p>The state Board of Elections, meanwhile,&nbsp;<a href="https://www.wfae.org/post/nc-board-elections-dont-forget-no-photo-id-required-primary#stream/2" target="_blank">sent postcards to voters recently</a>&nbsp;reminding people that they don't need to show IDs to vote in the primary.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.wfae.org/post/nc-photo-id-law-suffers-second-setback#stream/0" target="_blank"><em>Copyright WFAE 2020</em></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.wfdd.org/2020-02-18/nc-photo-id-law-suffers-second-setback</guid>
      <dc:creator>Steve Harrison, WFAE</dc:creator>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/5e7a850/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x602+0+0/resize/266x200!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2FVOTE%20%281%29_1_0.jpg" />
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/8794dc9/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x602+0+0/resize/702x528!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2FVOTE%20%281%29_1_0.jpg" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
