<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>ncwarn</title>
    <link>https://www.wfdd.org/tags/ncwarn</link>
    <description>ncwarn</description>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>Copyright</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:51:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.wfdd.org/tags/ncwarn.rss" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self" />
    <item>
      <title>Court: Group Can't Charge Greensboro Church For Power From Solar Panels</title>
      <link>https://www.wfdd.org/2017-09-19/court-group-cant-charge-greensboro-church-for-power-from-solar-panels</link>
      <description>A divided North Carolina appeals court says a clean-energy advocacy group can't install solar panels on a church roof and charge for the electricity…</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<figure><img src="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/4250e6b/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x600+0+0/resize/704x528!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2Fgavel.jpg"><figcaption></figcaption></figure><p>A divided North Carolina appeals court says a clean-energy advocacy group can't install solar panels on a church roof and charge for the electricity generated.</p>
<p>The state Court of Appeals panel split 2-1 Tuesday, with the majority ruling in favor of Duke Energy's legal monopoly to sell electricity to most of the state. The split means a state Supreme Court appeal is possible.</p>
<p>North Carolina Waste Awareness and Reduction Network appealed last year's decision by state regulators that the group was operating improperly as a public utility. The Durham nonprofit installed the solar array atop Faith Community Church in Greensboro, then charged about half Duke Energy's rate for the electricity produced.</p>
<p>The dissenting judge said the deal involved solar panels for a single customer, not a public utility requiring regulation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 19:51:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.wfdd.org/2017-09-19/court-group-cant-charge-greensboro-church-for-power-from-solar-panels</guid>
      <dc:creator>Associated Press</dc:creator>
      <media:thumbnail url="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/089593e/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x600+0+0/resize/267x200!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2Fgavel.jpg" />
      <media:content type="image/jpeg" url="https://npr.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/4250e6b/2147483647/strip/false/crop/800x600+0+0/resize/704x528!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnpr-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2Flegacy%2Fimages%2Fstory%2Fgavel.jpg" />
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
